A friend sent along the linked below article for me to read. I was excited, since it involved a topless redhead (bottomless would've been better. mmm, firecrotch). Thoughts are below:
1. this proves my theory on topless beaches--it's never the people you'd want to see naked. mostly old, mostly unattractive
2. maybe for this shy girl it took courage, but honestly, how privileged are you when the most daring thing you can think of doing is to take your top off for an afternoon in a very liberal city in the summer? seriously, if this girl had ever faced any hardships in her life, she would've passed on this assignment as beneath her. look at how experimental i am! stupid yuppie. in a world where women are forced to cover themselves from head to toe, and are burned with acid for disobeying a man's wishes, i am not impressed by her audacity. booji, yuppie wuss.
3. Also, check out the pictures. Inn the body of the article itself, they display the author's image. she's a 6. but in the picture in the heading, they obviously got a model, who, while not showing her face or tasty bits, has a much more attractive figure. Despite Nerve's pretenses of loving love in all its shapes and sizes, they still resort to classic concepts of beauty to lure people in.
I posted my first point onto the comments section of the article. Unfortunately, no one's replied yet.
http://www.nerve.com/regulars/ididitforscience/topless-in-the-park/
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment